LOGIN
ID
PW
MemberShip
2026-05-13 22:00:58
All News
Policy
Company
Product
Opinion
InterView
검색
Dailypharm Live Search
Close
Company
Xarelto sales fall 30% due to generics and price cuts
by
Oct 26, 2022 05:50am
The quarterly prescription of new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) containing rivaroxaban, which had reached KRW 15 billion, has shrunk to KRW 13 billion. This decrease is interpreted to be reflected by the price cut of Bayer’s original ‘Xarelto.’ Its generics that entered the market 1 year ago have been starting to slowly increase their share in the market, making KRW 2.4 billion in total. ◆Xarelto takes a direct blow from drug price cuts...Quarterly sales record KRW 11.3 billion According to the market research institution UBIST on the 25th, the domestic outpatient prescriptions of rivaroxaban recorded KRW 13.7 billion in Q3 this year, falling fell 16% compared to the KRW 16.4 billion it recorded in the same period last year. Sales of the original, Xarelto, fell 29% from KRW 15.9 billion to KRW 11.3 billion. Quarterly outpatient prescriptions of Xarelto fell from KRW 15.9 billion in Q3 last year, to KRW 15 billion in Q4, then to KRW 14.2 billion this year, to KRW 13.9 billion in Q1, then sunk to KRW 11.3 billion in Q3. This reduced sale is analyzed to have been greatly influenced by the drug price cut that had been made in August. The Seoul High Court ruled in favor of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in the lawsuit Bayer filed against MOHW to cancel the disposition on lowering Xarelto’s price. With the ruling, the drug price of all strengths(2.5·10·15·20mg) of Xarelto was reduced by 30% from August 22nd. Xarelto’s price had first been set to be reduced in May last year when the generics were first listed for reimbursement, but Bayer filed a suit on the unjustness of the price cut, claiming that the generics were released before Xarelto’s patent expiry, thus the execution of disposition should be suspended. As a result, the price cut had been suspended until the judgment on the merits. After about a year and two months, the final ruling had been made and the drug price was reduced. Considering the 30% price cut, there was no significant change in prescription volume compared to the same period last year. With this, the prescription amount of Xarelto is expected to be in the lower KRW 50 billion range. Its annual prescriptions last year were nearly KRW 60 billion. ◆Generics account for 18%...Sole lead held by Chong Kun Dang Xarelto’s generics have been increasing their influence in the market. In Q3, Xarelto generics made KRW 2.4 billion in total. In Q2 last year, the amount was KRW 0.3 billion, which rose to KRW 0.5 billion in Q3, to KRW 0.9 billion in Q4, then to the KRW 2 billion range this year. In Q1 2022, prescriptions rose to KRW 1.6 billion in Q1 and then KRW 2.1 billion in Q2. In Q3, generics have also been increasing steadily, accounting for an 18% share of the rivaroxaban market. With the sales of the generic increasing slightly and the original dropping significantly, the share of generics in the market rose 5%p from the previous quarter. Even though there was no change in the prescription amount of the original drug, the prescription amount of generics increased with the generic companies’ pioneering of new markets. Generic companies focused their marketing capabilities on local clinics as the original drug is mostly prescribed in hospitals or higher institutions. Instead of competing directly with the original, the companies focused on pioneering new markets. Although more than 60 companies have received approval for Xarelto generics, only Chong Kun Dang and Hanmi Pharmaceutical have made meaningful sales. Chong Kun Dang’s ‘Riroxia’ made KRW 0.8 billion in outpatient prescriptions in Q3, and accounted for 1/3 of the generic market. Chong Kun Dang released Riroxia in May last year, 5 months before patent expiry, and worked to preoccupy the market. Although other generic companies started to enter in October of the same year, unlike Chong Kun Dang which continuously made prescriptions after preoccupying the market, sales of the other generics remain in the KRW 0.1 billion range. Among generics, Hanmi Pharmaceutical’s ‘Riroxvan’ made KRW 0.5 billion in Q3 and is the only generic chasing Chong Kun Dang’s Riroxia’s sales in the market. Hanmi Pharmaceutical succeeded in avoiding Xarelto’s patent with SK Chemical and entered the market with generic exclusivity. Riroxvan, which sold KRW 0.2 billion in Q1, rose to KRW 0.4 billion in Q2, then KRW 0.5 billion in Q3. More than half of the approved generics have not yet released their versions in the market. With the lower dose of Xarelto (2.5mg) being listed for reimbursement from Q3, how this will affect the market is also gaining attention. 16 low-dose versions of Xarelto generics were listed for reimbursement in July. Rivaroxaban 2.5mg is mainly used in combination with aspirin to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial disease.
Policy
Price cut of Faslodex
by
Lee, Tak-Sun
Oct 26, 2022 05:50am
AstraZeneca's breast cancer treatment, Faslodex, will be a real match with Boryung's first generic Fulvet as it will be cut by 30% from the current upper limit starting next month due to a cut in drug prices following its entry into the generic. This is because the price has become almost similar to Boryung Fulvet, which has the same ingredients. This is a phenomenon caused by Boryung's addition to an innovative pharmaceutical company. According to industries on the 25th, AstraZeneca Faslodex will be sold at 376,724 won, down 30% from the current upper limit (538,178 won per pack) from the 1st of next month. Generic for Faslodex is Boryung Fulvet, which was registered on August 1st. Fulvet is the only generic for Faslodex in Korea imported by Boryung from India. Faslodex is a breast cancer treatment based on selective estrogen receptor decomposer (SERD) that recorded 7.5 billion won in sales based on IQVIA last year. It is used for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, which accounts for 80% of breast cancer, but it has not been long since it was approved in Korea in 2007, and started selling it in earnest after receiving a salary in 2019. In the meantime, it is analyzed that product competitiveness has also decreased with the emergence of new breast cancer drugs. The industry believes that there is a high possibility of growth in the future because oral CDK4/6 inhibitors such as Pfizer Ibrance and secondary treatment combined therapy are also receiving benefits. This is why Boryung introduced the first generic in India. Boryung also received additional benefits when it registered Fulvet's benefit in August. It was listed at 68% of the original upper limit. Given that general generics are set at 53.55%, the Fulvet price can be seen as high. It can be seen that the gap between the two products has almost disappeared as the original was cut to 70%. The original Faslodex is 376,724 won and the first generic Fulvet is 365,961 won, which are only about 10,000 won apart. Usually, there is a difference in drug prices because the original is set at 70% of the existing upper limit and the generic is set at 53.55%, but in the case of Fulvet, there is virtually no difference in drug prices from the first year. The two products will be the same at 288,194 won from August next year. Boryung is a leading anti-cancer drug manufacturer among domestic pharmaceutical companies, so it is predicted that it can sufficiently threaten the original with its sales power. In the future, competition between AstraZeneca and Boryung, Korea, is drawing attention.
Opinion
[Reporter's view] Two plays in the parliamentary audit
by
Kim, Jin-Gu
Oct 25, 2022 05:46am
A Member of Parliament asks about the need to introduce a prescription for active ingredients. Then, whether it was the Minister of Health and Welfare or the Minister of Food and Drug Safety, he replied that he sympathized with the purpose. There is a strong backlash from medical groups. This concludes the play. The same is true this year. Seo Young-seok, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, asked for the opinions of the Minister of Health and Welfare and the Minister of Food and Drug Safety on the introduction of a prescription for active recipients at a recently completed parliamentary audit of the National Assembly's Health and Welfare Committee. Oh Yoo-kyung, head of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, said, "I agree," and Minister Cho Kyu-hong avoided an immediate answer, saying, "I will discuss measures with the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety." The screenplay is much the same and only the actor changes every year. It is hard to find sincerity in both the National Assembly and the government that has raised questions and sympathized with the purpose. The introduction of the prescription of active ingredients is discussed only during the parliamentary audit season. This year's parliamentary audit also featured plays related to lowering generic drug prices. When Choi Jae-hyung, a member of the People's Power Party, pointed out that "the price of generic drugs is higher than that of advanced countries abroad," Minister Cho Kyu-hong replied, "We will find a way to lower them step by step." The authenticity doesn't feel much. There seems to be no fierce concern about the impact of the generic drug price cut on the domestic prescription market and the pharmaceutical industry. It seems to read the written script as it is, whether it is on the side of asking or answering. In 2012, the government implemented a package of weak cuts. At that time, the National Assembly pointed out that generic drugs were too expensive, and the government reorganized the drug price system under the pretext of financial reduction of health insurance. In the end, the damage caused by this was suffered by the domestic pharmaceutical industry. This is not to say that discussions on lowering generic drug prices should begin. It is repeated every season of the parliamentary audit. It is necessary to think more deeply about how much the shock is in the process of reading and answering the set script. As it is a huge topic that will shake up the pharmaceutical prescription market and the pharmaceutical industry, there should have been time to gather opinions, whether it is a debate or a public hearing, before simple questions and answers. The National Assembly and the government are expected to repeat the parliamentary audit next year similar to this year. The play with the obvious ending is not interesting. I hope that a more sincere and novel script will be written on the stage, where the theme of health insurance fiscal reduction is to be the theme.
Company
Genuone challenges Trajenta’s non-listed patent...Why?
by
Kim, Jin-Gu
Oct 25, 2022 05:46am
Genuone Sciences has challenged the unlisted patents of Trajenta (linagliptin). Industry interpretations are that the move is the company’s strategy to remove uncertainties in releasing generic versions of Trajenta and to additionally attract CMO deals” According to industry sources on the 24th, Genuone Sciences filed a trial to confirm the passive scope of patent rights and invalidation trials for the 5 Trajenta patents, 3 of which are use patents set to expire in May 2027, and one substance and one process patent set to expire in April 2027. One interesting thing to note is that all these patents are not listed on Korea’s patent register. As the patents are not listed on the register, the companies will have no problem obtaining approval for their generic versions even if they do not overcome the patents. However, the situation is different in terms of releasing the products into the market. Administratively, generic drugs can be released when the listed patents expire, but this carries the burden of being involved in a patent infringement lawsuit with the original company. If the original company files an application for an injunction to block the release of the product at the same time it files the patent infringement lawsuit, the release date of generics can be delayed for companies. Also, if generic companies lose the patent infringement lawsuits, this may lead to lawsuits for damages. This is why many generic companies have been challenging unlisted patents to remove uncertainties. Genuone Sciences’ challenge of Trajenta’s unlisted patents is also interpreted to be along this line. There is also the interpretation that Genuone Sciences challenged the unlisted patents of Trajenta to attract additional CMO deals. Genuone Sciences succeeded in avoiding and invalidating the existing Trajenta patent but was unable to receive generic exclusivity (first generic marketing exclusivity) for the drug because it wasn’t able to satisfy the ‘initial request for trial’ condition. 19 companies including Alvogen Korea own generic exclusivity for Trajenta generics. In this context, other companies will be interested in the CMO manufacture of Trajenta generics if Genuone Sciences succeed in removing uncertainties by avoiding and invalidating the unlisted patents. Genuone Sciences CMO Trajenta generics for White Life Science and Pharmgen Science. The company made agreements to manufacture the 2.5mg/1000mg dose only for White Life Science, and manufactures the 5mg/500mg and 2.5mg/850mg dose for White Life Science and Pharmgen Science. By formulation, this means that the company may take on 1-2 more companies for manufacture. Trajeta is Boehringer Ingelheim’s DPP-4 inhibitor antidiabetic. Its outpatient prescription sales had been KRW 130.7 billion for the single agent (Trajenta) and combination agent (Trajenta Duo) last year. Trajenta raised KRW 94.2 billion in sales until Q3 this year. The patent for the product is set to expire in June 2024. 65 companies have overcome Trajenta's patent and received approval to manufacture its generics. The companies are expected to release their products at the time of Trajenta’s patent expiry.
Company
Cibinqo lands in general hospitals in Korea
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Oct 25, 2022 05:46am
Pfizer’s second Janus kinases (JAK) inhibitor ‘Cibinqo (abrocitinib) has landed and may be prescribed at general hospitals in Korea. According to industry sources, Pfizer Korea’s new JAK1 inhibitor drug (abrocitinib) has passed the drug committee (DC) reviews of the ‘Big 5 tertiary hospitals’ of Korea including the Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul Asan Medical Center, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Asan Medical Center, and Sinchon Severance Hospital, as well as 24 medical institutions including Gangnam Severance Hospital, Korea University Guro Hospital, and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The company applied for its reimbursement listing in April, and as the agenda passed Drug Reimbursement Standard Subcommittee deliberations in August, prescriptions will be made quickly once reimbursement is applied. However, Lilly Korea’s ‘Olumiant (baricitinib),’ and ‘Abbvie’s ‘Rinvoq (upadacitinib)’ has already been receiving reimbursement for the atopic dermatitis indication since May, and when considering how the company made the strategic move to accept the weighted average price of its alternatives, its reimbursement progress is not on the faster side. The drug, which was approved for atopic dermatitis, is Pfizer’s follow-up of ‘Xeljanz (tofacitinib)’ that is set to compete with ‘’ Lilly Korea’s ‘Olumiant (baricitinib),’ ‘Abbvie's ‘Rinvoq (upadacitinib)’ in the same indication. Olumiant and Rinvoq were approved for reimbursement in May this year, and the reimbursement listing process for Cibinqo is also in progress. Cibinqo was approved in November of last year when the reimbursement listing for Olumiant and Rinvoq was being reviewed. As a JAK1 inhibitor, the drug modulates multiple cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis, including interleukin IL-4, IL-13, IL-31, IL-22, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is indicated for the treatment of adults and adolescents over the age of 12 with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Cibinqo demonstrated its efficacy through the Phase III trials JADE MONO-1, MONO-2, COMPARE, etc. The drug reduced the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) by over 70% at week 12 and demonstrated improvement in itch relief in 2 weeks after initiating treatment. Its pivotal study, JADE Mono-1, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses (100 mg and 200 mg once daily) of Cibinqo monotherapy in patients 12 years of age and older with moderate-to-severe AD for 12 weeks. Results showed that 63% of the Cibinqo 200 mg administered group had achieved EASI-75 (improvement of at least 75% in lesion extent and severity) at week 12, which was a significant improvement compared to the 12% in the placebo group. Also, the rate of patients that achieved EASI-90 at week 12 had been 39% in the Cibinqo group, 5% higher than the placebo group.
Company
GSK has signed a sales contract with GC Pharma & Kwang Dong
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Oct 25, 2022 05:46am
GSK has signed a joint sales contract with two domestic companies, GC Pharma and Kwang Dong, to sell the shingles vaccine Shingrix. GSK Korea announced on the 24th that it signed a Co-Promotion and Distribution Partnership for Shingrix's domestic sales and marketing on the 21st. Through this partnership, GC Pharma and Kwang Dong will jointly promote GSK's new shingles vaccine Shingrix on all distribution channels, including hospitals. GSK subsidiary is expected to strengthen its expertise in the distribution of shingles vaccines by selecting GC Pharma and Kwang Dong, which have domestic sales networks and marketing know-how accumulated in the shingles vaccine sector. "We are pleased to introduce a shingles prevention vaccine for adults over 50 and those over 18 years of age through a strategic partnership with GC Pharma and Kwang Dong, which have expertise in vaccine distribution," GSK President Rob Kempton said. Heo Eun-cheol, CEO of GC Pharma, said, "We are very happy to partner with GSK, a leading global healthcare company. Based on GC Pharma's accumulated vaccine know-how and understanding of distribution, we will work closely with GSK to provide better shingles prevention options to more people, he said. Choi Sung-won, CEO of Kwang Dong, said, "Kwang Dong has achieved various achievements for a wide range of patients and medical staff through partnerships with various domestic and foreign companies." "We will contribute to the health of the people by focusing on Shingrix the professional capabilities that GSK has developed as a vaccine distribution and marketing partner since 2015," he stressed. Meanwhile, Shingrix is scheduled to be released in Korea in December.
Policy
Lenvima's PMS results for 6 years
by
Lee, Hye-Kyung
Oct 25, 2022 05:45am
The permission of Lenvima, a thyroid-targeted anticancer drug, will be changed based on the results of a six-year post-marketing survey conducted in Korea. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety will prepare a change order (proposal) based on the results of the post-marketing investigation of Lenvima by Eisai Korea and conduct an opinion inquiry by the 3rd of next month. Lenvima treated patients with localized recurrent or metastatic progressive differentiated thyroid cancer who did not respond to radioactive iodine in October 2015. It obtained an item license in Korea for its effectiveness. Later, Lenvima's primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma and KIF5B-RET-positive lung adenocarcinoma clinical trials have expanded the condition of endometrial cancer (MSI-H) or dMMR in patients, who have undergone primary treatment, previously systemic treatment, and inadequate surgical or radiation therapy. Over the past six years, Eisai has conducted a domestic post-marketing survey of 132 people following a review. As a result, the expression rate of abnormal cases was reported as 93.94% (124/132, a total of 659 cases) regardless of the causal relationship. Among them, 8.33% (11/132 people, 15 cases) of serious drug abnormalities cannot exclude causal relationships. Diarrhea was common, and lymph node abscesses, seizures, helplessness, death, and thrombocytopenia progressed. Unexpected drug adverse reactions were 27.27% (36/132, 60 cases), commonly showing pain, edema, chest pain, decreased liver function tests, decreased eating, and liver disorders, and rarely showed lymph node abscess, follicle, urethritis, worsening systemic health, and peripheral swelling.
Company
Lyumjev can be prescribed in general hospitals
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Oct 24, 2022 06:08am
The new fast-acting insulin ‘Lyumjev’ can now be prescribed at general hospitals in Korea. According to industry sources, Lilly Korea’s ‘Lyumjev (insulin lispro)’ has passed the drug committee (DC) reviews of various medical institutions including the Samsung Medical Center. Lyumjev, which was approved in Korea in December last year, has been approved for reimbursement since September this year. Its prescriptions are expected to begin in earnest after landing in more general hospitals. As mealtime insulin, Lyumjev contains the active ingredient ‘insulin lispro-aabt,’ and is used to help reduce blood sugar levels in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who have difficulty managing target blood glucose levels or whose blood glucose level increases after meals. The domestic approval was made based on results from the PRONTO clinical trial program that was conducted on adult patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. PRONTO-T1D and PRONTO-T2D are treat-to-target, multicenter, parallel studies Phase III clinical trials in which patients in each treatment arm were first treated to reach the same blood sugar level, and then compared for their main therapeutic effects, including the rate of hypoglycemia, postprandial glucose (PPG) control, and period of proper blood sugar maintenance. Study results showed that Lyumjev demonstrated non-inferiority to Humalog (lispro 100U)’ in the primary endpoint, which was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks. Also, Lyumjev demonstrated superiority over Humalog in reducing 1-hour and 2-hour postprandial glucose excursions. Meanwhile, Phase I trial results on Type 1 diabetes patients have also shown that Lyumjev’s absorption of insulin into the bloodstream was faster than that of ‘Humalog,’ ‘Insulin Aspart,’ and ‘fast-acting Insulin Aspart.’ The blood glucose results of patients up to 3 hours following injection of Lyumjev were similar to those of participants without diabetes.
Company
Will Onureg, an acute leukemia maintenance drug be listed?
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Oct 24, 2022 06:08am
Attention is focusing on whether Onureg will be able to be listed on the insurance benefit list. According to related industries, Onureg of BMS Pharmaceutical Korea is expected to be submitted to the HIRA Cancer Disease Review Committee on the 2nd of next month. Onureg is the only oral maintenance of acute myeloid leukemia. It was approved in Korea in March as a treatment for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia who achieved CRi or incomplete hematological recovery after induction therapy and were not suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Acute myeloid leukemia is also fatal among leukemia. Without treatment, 90% of people die within a year. Even if it becomes CR, the risk of recurrence is also high because up to 100 million residual leukemia cells may remain. If proper treatment is not accompanied after CR, the recurrence rate reaches up to 50% within a year, and the median OS value is only 8 months in case of recurrence. Maintenance therapy that can prevent recurrence and maintain CR condition as stable as possible is drawing attention. Onureg proved its validity through a phase 3 study of QUAZAR AML-001 in 472 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. As a result of the study, the mOS of the patient group who took Onureg was 24.7 months, extending the survival period by 10 months from 14.8 months in the placebo group and lowering the risk of death by 31%. At the time of 1 and 2 years of treatment, the proportion of patients who survived in the Onureg group was 73% (56% in the placebo group) and 51% (37% in the placebo group), respectively, which were higher than in the placebo group. RFS also confirmed the effect of reducing the risk of recurrence as Onureg reached 10.2 months, which is 5.3 months longer than the placebo group. The proportion of patients who did not recur after 6 months of treatment was 67% in the Onureg group, higher than 45% in the placebo group, and even at one year, the proportion of patients who did not recur was higher in the Onureg group.
Policy
How did Zerbaxa get recognized for its benefit?
by
Lee, Tak-Sun
Oct 24, 2022 06:08am
There is an item that Rep. Choi Jae-hyung of the People's Power, who has been criticized by the pharmaceutical industry for insisting on lowering generic drug prices during the parliamentary audit, is praising his salary registration. It is the super antibiotic Zerbaxa. At the HIRA parliamentary audit held on the 13th, he said, "200 to 300 people die every year from antibiotic resistance, and Zerbaxa's benefit was a meaningful decision." He also argued that generic drug prices should be lowered to secure health insurance finances, saying that it is necessary to make a forward-looking decision to set the price of such super antibiotics. Zerbaxa is an antimicrobial agent used to treat complex intra-abdominal infections, complex urinary tract infections, and hospital-infected pneumonia. In June, the HIRA recognized the appropriateness of the benefit, which was different from the review of benefit rejection in 2019 with unclear cost-effectiveness. The reason why the evaluation results have changed is that the drug has become possible to omit PE in the meantime. In October 2020, the government revised related regulations to allow the omission of PE data on tuberculosis treatments, antibacterial drugs, and emergency detoxification drugs included in national essential drugs. The results of the recent evaluation of benefit adequacy for low-dose owners released on the HIRA website show this well. Zerbaxa was recognized for its appropriateness in a review by the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Evaluation Commission held on June 2. As a result of the evaluation at the time, "The applied product is a drug that has been approved for the treatment of complex intra-abdominal infection, complex urinary tract infection (including pyelonephritis), and hospital infection pneumonia (including ventilator-related pneumonia)." This is clinically useful, but the cost-effectiveness corresponding to the cost is unclear because the cost required compared to the alternative drug is expensive, he added. He judged, "It is an antimicrobial agent that is a national essential drug, meets the conditions for PE performance in excluded countries, and is listed in more than three excluded countries, so it is appropriate to benefit when considering the price registered in excluded countries." Although it is a drug that can omit submission of PE data, it is necessary to consider it when negotiating drug prices because the number of patients is higher than that of rare disease treatments or anticancer drugs and the financial impact of antibiotic resistance is uncertain. These contents were reflected when Benefit was applied. The Health Insurance Policy Review Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare explained Zerbaxa's benefit registration and judged that "the company's application price is more cost-effective than the Japanese drug price, which is the lowest price in A7. Among the A7 countries, it was listed in the U.S., Japan, Italy, and the U.K., and the average price for a bottle was 108,383 won. However, the expansion cap RSA contract was signed to reduce financial uncertainty. Through negotiations with the NHIS, if the cap exceeds a certain amount, the amount will be refunded to the corporation. The Drug Evaluation Committee selected Coliseum methane sulfonic acid as an alternative drug when determining cost-effectiveness. Two drugs are registered in Korea, with the upper limit of 20,349 won per bottle and 17,922 won per bottle, respectively, due to Seoul Medical's Colistate Inj and SCD's Colis Inj. The difference was large compared to Zerbaxa, which was listed at 60,098 won per bottle. The Drug Evaluation Committee cited that Coliseum methane sulfonic acid as an alternative drug has efficacy in bladder inflammation and pyelonephritis and that it is a drug that is recognized for "all existing antibiotics-resistant" beyond the scope of the permit. However, Zerbaxa was inevitably expensive compared to this Coliseum methane sulfonic acid, making it difficult to satisfy the cost-effectiveness. Instead, PE was exempted and the benefit adequacy was recognized while satisfying the lowest price adjusted by the A7 country.
<
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
>