

Civic groups, pharmacists, and healthcare experts have unanimously agreed that the government should consider implementing the system if it enhances patient choice and reduces national spending.
The policy debate, titled 'Introduction of a Korean Model of International Nonproprietary Name (INN) prescriptions to Expand the Public's Choice of Dispensed Medicines,' took place at the National Assembly on September 30.
The event was hosted by Democratic Party of Korea Representatives In-soon Nam, Young-seok Seo, Yoon Kim, and Jong-tae Jang, as well as Cho Kuk Innovation Party Representative Sun-min Kim.
The Korean Pharmaceutical Association and the Research Institute for Pharmaceutical Policy also hosted it.
The panelists agreed that the INN prescriptions should not be viewed merely as a dispute over vested interests between doctors and pharmacists.
The priority, they stressed, should be identifying the system that best benefits patients, who are insurance subscribers, by increasing their right to choose medication, and the government should design the system accordingly.
The governing parties and the government, who are the proponents of the system's introduction, stated that they agree on the necessity of the system for drugs with unstable supply and are currently pursuing it.
However, they presented the prerequisite that public consensus on the need for the system must be formed first.

"Will Enhance Patient Choice and Fiscal Savings…The Best System Helps Patients"

Sung-min Park, an associate professor at Seoul National University's Graduate School of Public Health, said, "Brand-based drug labeling increases the risk of confusion and errors during prescribing, dispensing, and administration." He added, "There is a risk of prescribing and dispensing mistakes due to confusion with similar names.
Patients also face a higher risk of mistakenly taking the wrong drug."
Professor Park said, "When patients with multiple illnesses receive prescriptions from various medical institutions, there is a high possibility of being prescribed the same drug ingredient redundantly," and added, "If patients are unaware of the ingredients, they are more likely to overdose, and discarded unused drugs lead to unnecessary expenditure of National Health Insurance funds."

Creating an environment where patients can make choices must be prioritized.
Furthermore, the system must be premised on the therapeutic equivalence of generics so that patients are not anxious about their choices." Oh also said, "Encouraging patient participation in and choice over the medication they take is the desirable direction for this system," adding, "It also has the advantage of reducing dependence on brand names, which is currently very high." "Not a dispute over interests between doctors and pharmacists… Key to Completing Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing" Kwang-min Lee, Vice President of the Korean Pharmaceutical Association, argued that the current brand-name prescribing practice prevents the fundamental intent of the Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing System from being realized.

Furthermore, Lee also pointed out that brand-name prescribing directly influences prescribing behavior and healthcare utilization, citing the tendency for self-injectable drugs, such as obesity injections, to be dispensed directly by hospitals.
Lee directly criticized the link between brand-name prescribing and illegal business practices by pharmaceutical companies, wholesalers, and CSOs, arguing that it leads to the misuse and abuse of medications.
Lee said, "If INN prescriptions become implemented, patients will be able to conveniently receive dispensing services at pharmacies near their homes or workplaces, not just those near medical institutions." He added, "Even patients using multiple institutions for multiple illnesses can receive unified dispensing and medication guidance services from their regular pharmacy, rather than relying on pharmacies near each institution.
This will also have the effect of reducing unnecessary drug use."

By not formalizing its position, the government is causing unnecessary social conflict." Nam added, "Provided that safety and efficacy are not compromised, the public will agree to a policy that can save NHI funds.
I understand that both the Democratic Party and the government are willing to put INN prescriptions on the public agenda.
I hope a forum for public discussion involving doctors, pharmacists, and the public can be arranged." "INN prescriptions limited to supply shortage drugs still under discussion"…what do the governing party and government plan? What are the opinions of the National Assembly and the government regarding the highly debated INN prescriptions?

Won-joon Cho, Senior Expert Member for Health and Welfare at the Democratic Party of KoreaThe ruling Democratic Party of Korea and the administrative ministry, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, both agreed on the necessity of introducing the system limited to supply shortage drugs.
However, they drew a clear line, stating that widespread adoption of the system would require prior public consensus.
Rep.
Won-joon Cho, Senior Expert Member for Health and Welfare at the Democratic Party of Korea, explained, "The Tylenol shortage was one of the three major crises after COVID-19.
Even in the National Assembly, there was an internal discussion about the need for INN prescriptions for a certain period, given the special circumstances of the pandemic, but it was not pursued," and added, "At that time, the burden of opposition from the medical community could not be overcome.
It is from this perspective that a limited INN prescriptions was included in the Democratic Party's last presidential election pledge." Rep.
Cho said, "Bills related to INN prescriptions are being introduced, and the National Assembly has plans to discuss institutional improvements and legal amendments." He added, "Various policy measures are being proposed to resolve drug supply instability in addition to the limited introduction of INN prescriptions.
All these policy measures must be mobilized to resolve the recurring problem of drug supply instability as much as possible."

INN prescriptions is one of the alternatives being discussed to resolve this." Kang said, "It is undesirable that this issue is being highlighted as a conflict between doctors and pharmacists," and added, "Doctors, pharmacists, and the public must discuss this to find a common ground." He concluded, "The government is preparing measures to simplify alternative dispensing and introduce INN prescriptions limited to supply shortage drugs.
It seems necessary to conduct specific research on how to introduce INN prescriptions for supply shortage drugs.
We understand that foreign countries encourage this through various methods, not necessarily mandating it.
We also intend to review these aspects.

댓글 운영방식은
댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.
댓글 노출방식은
댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.
댓글의 삭제 기준은
다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.
저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우
상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물
타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물
근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물
특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우
특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용
사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우
욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용
정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)
특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우
특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우
특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우
타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우
게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용
서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우
동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우
부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함
제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우
돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물
게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우
수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우
기타사항
각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우
기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우
기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용
사실 관계 확인 후 삭제
저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우
타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우
당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)
※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.
※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.
※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.