LOGIN
ID
PW
MemberShip
2026-05-11 19:41:20
All News
Policy
Company
Product
Opinion
InterView
검색
Dailypharm Live Search
Close
Policy
First year of Rare Disease Support Scheme
by
Eo, Yun-Ho
Nov 04, 2019 08:13am
The biggest issue of the policy is ‘lack of interest’. ‘Rare disease’ is not a specific categorization, but rather it is designated based on frequency of diagnosis. Korea defines ‘rare disease’ as a disease diagnosed to less than 20,000 people. With small patient size and lack of drug, these diseases are in dire need of new drug. But the voices of small handful of patients are easily lost in the air. At the moment in Korea, 951 diseases are designated as subject for Rare Disease Medical Aid Program, in which 927 of them are eligible for special case benefit. The total of 927 consists of 827 rare diseases as defined by the National Health Insurance special case copayment benefit system, and about 100 more added, as of August 2017, by a rare disease survey reflecting opinions of patients and their families, patient advocacy group, and medical experts. Previously, the government did not have a government-managed rare disease list without sufficient legal basis to back it up. So the size of rare disease patients was estimated according to the special case benefit subject list. Rare and chronic diseases were confused and defined as one keeping rare disease related policy making and researches limited. But growing voices criticized government for neglecting rare disease, and finally the Rare Disease Management Act was enacted in 2016. Since then, the first Rare Disease Management Plan was established, and in September 2018, the Rare Disease Patient Support Scheme was first implemented as more demanded for state-level rare disease patient support like disease management, treatment and prevention. ◆Rare disease patients supported by government:The objective of the Rare Disease Patient Support Scheme was to lessen patient’s financial burden of medical expense. The health authority applied special case benefit on the new rare diseases and expanded eligible disease for low-income patient medical aid. Including the newly designated 100 rare disease, now about 1,800 patients receive special case benefit, annually. Special case benefit system for rare disease patient started from applying 20 percent of copayment rate on artificial kidney dialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for chronic kidney failure patients, and the benefit continued to expand on hemophilia, Gaucher’s disease, leukemia and cancer patients. But some undiagnosed rare disease patients had been excluded from the special case benefit due to unidentifiable diagnosis and disease code with limited patient size. And from last January, the roster for special case benefit and rare disease medical aid program subject diseases were unified. The revised regulation also stipulated special case benefit for undiagnosed rare disease patients without a disease code. Medical aid subject disease roster expanded significantly from 652 to 927 cases, granting financial support to about 2,600 more patients. Compared to last year, the Rare Disease Medical Aid Program bumped up this year’s budget and allocated about 32 billion won. The Rare Disease Patient Support Scheme includes Rare Disease Diagnosis Support Program to prevent patients from missing adequate treatment timing with difficulty in diagnosis. The diagnosis support program covers patients with Genetic Testing Support subject disease and undiagnosed condition. Also from this year, Rare Disease Regional Care Center Network has been expanded to ten centers, consisting of one Central Support Center and other Regional Support Centers. To sum it up, the Rare Disease Support Scheme mainly focuses on ▲establishing rare disease list and registration system, ▲increasing medical aid to reduce financial burden, and ▲expanding rare disease diagnosis support and Regional Support Centers. ◆Only 5% of diseases have treatment and NHI coverage rate is still low: Despite the government’s effort, some rare disease patients are still struggling to get access to treatment. Only about five percent of rare diseases have treatment developed. Diagnosis and treatment developments are far slower than other general medical conditions, because of small limited number of patients and prospective profit estimated low. And even if better treatments are developed, many of them are unapproved or non-reimbursed, leaving patients hopeless. Without guaranteed National Health Insurance (NHI) coverage on treatment, patients and their families would suffer not only from physical pain, but also with financial strain. More than 80 percent of rare diseases are inherited and patient’s family member show similar conditions. This vicious cycle leads medical expense in one single household to surge exponentially. However, the current Rare Disease Management Act does not specifically stipulate expansion of NHI coverage on rare disease treatments. Related industry claims Korea lacks a legal basis to back policy and regulation to boost pharmaceutical accessibility for rare disease patients catering unique qualities of the disease. Korea may have established a meaningful legislation of Rare Disease Management Act, but in fact, the law does not help many of struggling patients to get better access to drug to this date. Even at the National Assembly Annual Audit session, lawmakers urged the government to enhance NHI coverage on rare disease. Lawmaker Yoon Jong-pil of Liberty Korea Party spoke at Ministry of Health and Welfare audit session and pointed out, “Considering exceptionally limited number of patients and difficulty in developing effective treatment, rare disease treatment should be reviewed with more flexible criteria or they would not be accessible to patients in need”. .Drug pricing department of a multinational pharmaceutical company claimed, “An independent set of reimbursement review criteria should be designed for rare disease treatment as it is impossible to evaluate with common economic sense .And this is why special clause or supplementary article as a part of Rare Disease Management Act should stipulate expansion of coverage on rare disease treatment” .
Policy
Industry burdened but accepting of mandatory DSUR
by
Byun Kyung A
Oct 31, 2019 09:59am
Pharmaceutical industry initially complained of administrative strain when the government issued a notice on enforcing mandatory drug safety update report (DSUR)’, as advised by the National Assembly. But the industry also agrees with Korean government’s intention to enforce the pre-marketing regulation, which now has become a global trend. The pharmaceutical industry sees why the government would rather tighten the pre-marketing regulation than to cause actual corporate loss and public confusion over post-marketing recall and reimbursement and approval revocation. According to the lawmakers and pharmaceutical industry on October 27, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) plans to enforce mandatory submission of DSUR to strengthen clinical trial safety control. Currently, the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act does not stipulate mandatory DSUR submission. Along with post-marketing periodic safety update report (PSUR), DSUR has been an issue as a whistleblower from MFDS reported how “the ministry neglects its most basic job and does not even review submitted drug safety materials”. Criticism on MFDS neglecting drug review expertise grew intensely as drug quality and safety issues, such as ranitidine impurity incident and Invossa-K approval revocation, surfaced all at once. Accordingly, the lawmakers tackled the ministry on DSUR and PSUR management at the recent National Assembly Annual Audit. MFDS accepted the criticism and vowed to reinforce related regulation. MFDS official stated, “The ministry reviewed a total of 2,823 PSUR materials in last five years, and drug safety information reported from around the world were evaluated and reflected during the reexamination period”, and “mandatory DSUR would be enforced from 2020 based on the five-year National Health Insurance Comprehensive Plan announced last August”. Starting with new drug, MFDS is to phase in mandatory DSUR submission from next year considering pharmaceutical industry’s human resource, cost and other preparation procedure. Pharmaceutical industry showed mixed feelings of burden and need of the tightened regulation. Many also saw DSUR as unavoidable task the industry should take in as it is a pre-marketing regulation in clinical trial phase. “It is difficult to happily accept the new regulation as a company. DSUR submission, despite the phase-in introduction, would inevitably burden the industry with development cost and time,” but “we do agree the regulation is needed. Already many pharmaceutically advanced countries have enforced mandatory DSUR and it is now a global trend Korea cannot avoid,” a pharmaceutical administrative personnel from Korean pharmaceutical company commented. The Korean company associate also added, “Time would not be much of an issue, as it would be applied to new drug first, and give plenty of preparation time. The regulation aims to reinforce drug safety measures before commercialization, and not to be an excessive over-regulation. MFDS officials would probably convene a regulatory seminar for companies”. A multinational pharmaceutical company insider predicted DSUR would be less of a problem, as it regulates pre-marketing phase and not post-marketing. The multinational company associate said, “The authority has been trying to swiftly solve recent drug safety and approval revocation issues with strict regulation, retrospectively. Meanwhile, DSUR is a pre-marketing regulation that minimizes post-marketing measures but raises the bar for drug safety management. The actual strain on the industry would be relatively insignificant”.
Policy
Weighted pricing benefit abused as permanent price booster
by
Byun Kyung A
Oct 31, 2019 09:58am
The government evaluated the current weighted drug pricing system has been digressed as a permanent pricing benefit. Apparently, 96 percent of items have maintained the benefitted pricing for more than three years, and the authority sees that such practice has distanced itself from the initial objective to secure stable supply. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) submitted a statement answering the National Assembly Health and Welfare Committee Audit addressing the issue. Previously, Liberty Korea Party Lawmaker Kim Soon-Rye questioned the ministry about revising drug pricing system and strengthening competitiveness of Korean companies. In summer, MOHW presented revised 'Decision-making and Modification Standard for Drug Item' and unveiled weighted pricing system revision plan as a part of generic pricing system revision. The system was revised to set one year period of weighted pricing for synthetics and biopharmaceuticals, but provides maximum two years in case number of companies supplying the equivalent generics is less than three. The revision also established generic drug pricing standard and pricing for multi and single-use eye drops. On the revised weighted pricing system, MOHW explained “The initial objective of the system was to stabilize drug supply (weighted pricing for generics with less than three suppliers) and to induce soft landing for a generic entering the market where the original is lowering its price, from 100 percent to 70, and then to 50 percent.” “The revision was planned to keep the regulation faithful to its original objective maintaining stable drug distribution”, the ministry added. And the government emphasized its justification of drug pricing system revision as “244 out of 254 items, or 95 percent of the benefited items have been maintaining its increased price for more than three years, abusing the system as a permanent price boosting tool”. The ministry also ensured it would thoroughly review individual cases that need special support to stabilize drug supply. The statement added MOHW’s commitment to contribute strengthening Korean pharmaceutical company’s global competitiveness by executing the Biohealth Industry Innovation Strategy and Pharmaceutical Industry Fostering and Support Master Plan.
Policy
For reimbursed drug, efficacy and cost-efficiency come first
by
Byun Kyung A
Oct 31, 2019 09:34am
On the last day of the 20th National Assembly Annual Audit for the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), half the questions were dedicated to pharmaceutical affairs. The lawmakers of the NA Health and Welfare Committee questioned HIRA about NHI reimbursement reevaluation on dementia treatment choline alfoscerate, reimbursement expansion on NOAC Xarelto, and reimbursement expansion on the anticancer treatment reflecting its frequent non-reimbursed off-label use as ophthalmic solution. Some lawmakers claimed the General Principle of Healthcare Reimbursement on liquid solutions, like syrup and suspensions, should be revised and expand utilization cap eligible for reimbursement. As always, however, HIRA had a strictly basic answer for the said topics and stated, “The issues addressed would be sufficiently reviewed when clinical efficacy and cost-efficiency are proven”. Below is Daily Pharm’s summary of HIRA’s written answer submitted to the NA on Oct. 28. ◆Reimbursement reevaluation on choline alfoscerate: The current system does not stipulate a reevaluation for NHI reimbursement based on clinical efficacy, except for special cases of Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) revoking an approval. The government's National Health Insurance Comprehensive Plan is to establish a pharmaceutical reevaluation system considering clinical efficacy of listed drug, financial impact and healthcare coverage listing status in foreign countries. HIRA, then, plans to have Drug Post-evaluation Subcommittee under Drug Reimbursement Evaluation Committee (DREC) to conduct NHI reimbursement feasibility reevaluation with the new system. Particularly, HIRA official stressed uncertainty of choline alfoscerate “has been questioned constantly” and that the agency would “establish reevaluation system promptly for it”. The dementia treatment is usually sold as a health functional food in other countries. ◆Expanded reimbursement benefit on Xarelto: Medical industry urges the health authority to grant NHI benefit on new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) Xarelto (rivaroxaban) to high-risk patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), specifically for cases of atrial fibrillation (AF) before and after catheter ablation and electrical cardiodiversion, nonvalvular AF with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and nonvalvular AF with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 1. At the moment, Brilinta (ticagrelor) and Xarelto are listed for reimbursement as antiplatelets, and the benefit for Xarelto only covers high-risk patients with nonvalvular AF. HIRA answered, “As medical academic society has requested expanding reimbursement benefit on Xarelto, the agency plans to promptly review additional clinical evidences, such as revised guideline in foreign countries”, and the treatment’s “reimbursement would be expanded depending on clinically proven efficacy”. ◆Revising General Principle for syrup and suspensions: The current General Principle on Healthcare Reimbursement Criteria and Method stipulates granting NHI reimbursement benefit on pharmaceutical syrup and suspensions, also available in types of table or capsule with equivalent ingredient, in following cases; prescribed to patients younger than 13; patients with old age, dementia or other dysfunctional esophagus unable to swallow; prescribed with antacid, sucralfate, and sodium alginate under approved indication. The National Assembly pointed out the General Principle regarding pharmaceutical liquid solution should be amended and provide healthcare benefit for all Koreans to consume drug more conveniently. But HIRA official explained, “Liquid solution tends to be more expensive than tablet or capsule drugs”, therefore, “the General Principle, on Oct. 1, 2011, stipulated providing benefit to subject drugs meeting cost-efficiency standard under certain medical state and patient condition”. Since 2011, some syrup and suspension with proven cost-efficiency have received reimbursement as an exception to the General Principle. HIRA official added, “The agency would accordingly review the need to amend general reimbursement criteria based on cost-efficiency standard”. ◆Listing Avastin for reimbursement: This year’s National Assembly Audit addressed promptly providing reimbursement for non-reimbursed off-label treatment approved to be used. The issue refers to the use of anticancer treatment Avastin in ophthalmology as a non-reimbursed off-label treatment for macular generation. After consulting with Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), HIRA allowed request for use of non-reimbursed treatment at clinics without an institutional review board (IRB) by revising ‘Standard and Procedure of Requesting Usage Approval of Non-reimbursed Off-label Drug’ this month. HIRA stated it would consider providing healthcare reimbursement benefit in the future, when the legitimately used off-label drugs meet clinical efficacy and cost-efficiency standards. ◆Expanding RSA for follow-on drugs: As the RSA subject regulation for severe disease has been revised in last July, HIRA plans to positively review feasibility of expanding RSA subject for follow-on drugs after collecting public opinions. ◆Preventing illegal drug distribution: HIRA has decided to upgrade monitoring system to better manage all drug distribution information and to utilize the collected information properly through the serialization system. HIRA currently requires a serial number to be labeled on minimal drug distribution unit container for the health authority to track individual unit in all phase of distribution, from manufacturing to import, distribution, and consumption. In last May, HIRA cooperated with Seoul city community police to investigate illegal distribution of a weight-loss medicine Saxenda injection. ◆Drug pricing standard for the revised Generic Pricing Policy: The latest revision in the Generic Drug Pricing Policy stipulates drug pricing differentiated with compensation for cost, time and investment spent on generic development, and revised weighted pricing system. Nonetheless, the pricing standard for incrementally modified new drug is same as before. As the new weighted pricing policy could bring down prices of some incrementally modified drugs (IMD), HIRA plans to adequately amend the standard with Ministry of Health and Welfare. HIRA official said, “IMDs are mostly developed by Korean pharmaceutical companies, so drug pricing benefit without limitation on IMD could cause international trade discrepancy as unfairly favorable benefit for Korean companies only”, but “the agency would continue to talk to other related ministries and industry about other means to promote development of IMD with better clinical efficacy”. ◆Revising PE analysis review process: In Australia and Canada, a company is responsible for submitting pharmaco-economic analysis and a public agency is responsible for reviewing the submitted material. But in Korea, pharmaceutical companies have difficulties editing submitted PE analysis report. Lawmakers claimed Korea should adopt ‘Application Registration System’ to prevent such inconvenience. HIRA official answered, “it would be reviewed in detail, surveying overseas cases and current conditions in Korea”.
Policy
Jext, only distributed to KOEDC for profits
by
Lee, Jeong-Hwan
The company that exclusively deals with one of urgent drugs, Jext used for allergic reaction Shock (Anaphylaxis) was criticized for distributing drugs only through KOEDC( Korea orphan & Essential Drug Centers ) for profit. Even though Jext was listed insurance registration last July and it is possible for the company to make direct distribution, The price between general reimbursement and KOEDC reimbursement has big difference. So, Jext distributed only to KOEDC. According to the patients and KOEDC on the 11th, Jext has been distributed and sold patients only through KOEDC since domestic reimbursement listed. It is in patients and KOEDC view that KOEDC reimbursement is much higher than general reimbursement, and it makes economic burden to patients. The company says it is not for profit at all. The headquarters regulates the distribution of general reimbursement items, so the company is inevitably unable to distribute the supply. In fact, KOEDC reimbursement price of Jext is ₩134,933 more than double the general reimbursement price is ₩56,670. The company distributes Jext only through KOEDC until insurance registration listed. But it is still on sale only through KOEDC, even though Jext got general reimbursement listed and can be distributed at clinics or retail pharmacies. The reimbursement price of KOEDC is calculated based on the import cost, whereas the general reimbursement price is meticulously formulated through registraion procedure of Health Insurance Review & Assessment Services. It is the majority opinion of reimbursement specialists that it is much more profitable to sell at KOEDC than to distribute Jext at the general imbursement. Furthermore, the distribution of Jext through KOEDC significantly reduces additional marketing and management tasks such as account management costs required for direct distribution. That's one of the reasons why the direct distribution is delayed. However, if the distributor don't handle the medicine reimbursement listed directly for 6 months, the regulatory action is removed. It even raises doubts that the company deliberately distributes Jext only to KOEDC. Regardless of the company's intentions, as a result, patients need to get Jext ony by paying more expensive money through KOEDC because thiere is no distribution volume, even though there is a way to purchase Jext at significantly lower reimbursement. KOEDC official said, the prodcut is not in shortage of distribution, but the the company distributes medicines only to KOEDC and dose not supply them directly. It's reluctant. In the end, patients have to go and buy through KOEDC with higher price for almost 6 months even after reimbursement listed, there has never been a company using this trick so far. The deliberate coordination disregards the purpose of establishing KOEDC and the policy of expanding access to ER medicines for patients. In response to such criticism, the company said that it is not a distribution control for profitability, and will start direct distribution as soon as possible. The company official said, It was true that Jext was distributed only to KOEDC after July when reimbursement listed, but it was not intended. It was a supply disruption at the headquarters in preparation for improved Korean insert, etc. The official added, "The company will import Jext products within this month and supply them directly from next January after our own quality inspection".
Policy
사용량-약가연동 협상지침 변경...일회성 환급 범위 확대(H)
by
Jung, Heung-Jun
[데일리팜=정흥준 기자]사용량-약가연동 협상에서 약가인하 대신 일회성 환급계약을 할 수 있는 약제 범위가 확대될 예정이다.저출산 극복을 위한 정부 정책 지원으로 사용량이 증가한 약제는 일회성 환급계약을 체결할 수 있게 된다.또 법정감염병 대응을 위한 국가 비축 약제가 사용될 경우, 수요 변동성을 고려해 협상대상 제외약제로 포함한다.11일 업계에 따르면, 국민건강보험공단은 오늘 오후까지 ‘사용량-약가연동 협상 세부운영지침’ 개정안에 대한 의견을 받고 있다.약가를 깎는 대신 일회성 환급을 받는 대상을 명확화하고, 새 기준을 신설해 범위를 확대한다.코로나 대응으로 도입된 규정인 만큼 ▲감염병 위기경보 ‘주의’ 이상 단계의 감염병 대응을 위한 유관기관의 생산·수입 요청 또는 행정 조치가 확인되는 경우 ▲분석대상기간 전년도 중 협상약제의 유일한 대체 약제에 생산 시설, 원료 수급 차질 등으로 불가피한 공급중단 또는 품절이 발생한 사실이 유관기관을 통해 확인되는 경우로 대상을 명확히 했다.또 ‘난임시술 급여기준’에 사용되는 약제가 급여 기준 변경 등 정책 지원 확대로 인해 사용량이 증가한 경우가 신설됐다.대상에 포함된다고 반드시 일회성 환급 계약을 해야 하는 것은 아니다. 규정 신설을 통해 일회성 환급 대상 협상참고가격 보정을 할 수도 있다.협상 대상 제외 약제에서 위험분담계약 체결 약제는 제외하고, 국가 비축 물자로 법정감염병에 대응하는 약제는 추가한다.감염병 예방관리에 관한 법률에 따라 국가 비축 물자에 해당하는 성분으로, 법정감염병 대응을 위해 비축된 약제가 사용될 경우는 PVA 협상 대상에서 제외된다.보험재정 영향에 대한 불확실성의 분담이라는 위험분담제 취지를 고려해 해당 약제는 협상 제외 대상이 되지 않는다. 협상 제외 대상이 되는 자진인하의 정의도 명확히 한다. 현재 ‘자진인하 신청에 의한 인하율이 협상참고가격에 의한 인하율보다 큰 품목’은 협상 대상에서 제외하고 있다.단, 급여 적정성 재평가, 급여확대 사전인하 등의 평가 결과 또는 공단과의 계약 사하에 따른 자진인하는 해당하지 않는 것으로 제한한다.해당 내용이 담긴 PVA 협상 지침은 의견 조회 이후 시행될 예정이며, 현재 모니터링이나 협상이 진행 중인 약제부터 적용한다.
Policy
중동전쟁 위기에 규제 특례 가속…비대면진료·AI 활용 확대(K)
by
Lee, Jeong-Hwan
[데일리팜=이정환 기자] 지역·필수·공공의료 공백 해소라는 정부 목표에 더해 중동발 전쟁 여파가 겹치면서 인공지능(AI)과 비대면진료를 토대로 한 규제 장벽 완화에 한층 속도가 붙는 분위기다.보건복지부는 지역·필수·공공의료 강화, 중동전쟁 위기 대응을 위해 AI, 비대면진료 등 신의료기술을 전폭적으로 활용할 수 있는 규제 선진화 행정에 앞장설 방침이다.이미 복지부는 중동전쟁으로 의료소모품 수급에 한층 더 어려움을 겪고 있는 희귀난치질환자들을 대상으로 주사기, 수액세트, 의약품 등 의료소모품을 비대면으로 직배송하는 행정에 나선 상태다.9일 복지부는 지역·필수·공공의료 강화 차원에서 AI·비대면진료를 공격적으로 쓸 수 있는 규제 합리화 방안을 모색할 계획이다.현재 복지부는 지역·필수·공공의료실(이하 지필공실) 신설을 위한 행정절차 막바지 단계다. 행정안전부 협의를 거쳐 지필공실 신설 필요성에 공감대를 형성했고 이에 필요한 인력과 예산을 배분받는 작업이 한창이다.복지부는 지필공실 신설, 조직 개편을 토대로 신의료기술을 지필공의료에 접목할 수 있는 여러가지 방안을 더 발굴할 방침이다.1차의료혁신 시범사업이 대표적인데 지자체와 지역 1차의료기관이 선제적으로 지필공의료를 쇄신할 수 있는 정책을 설계해 복지부에 제출하면 심의를 거쳐 정책·예산을 지원하는 행정이다.특히 국회를 통과한 추가경정예산을 기반으로 보건진료 전담 공무원을 통한 지필공의료 대응에 나설 수 있게 된 만큼 AI·비대면진료 규제 특례 사례를 더 발굴한다.중동전쟁 여파로 인한 희귀난치질환자 의료 피해 최소화를 위해 복지부와 비대면진료 플랫폼 솔닥이 힘을 합쳐 의료소모품, 의약품 비대면 직배송을 허용한 게 규제 특례 사례에 해당한다.복지부는 솔닥과 의료기관 연계 기반 자격 확인 시스템을 활용해 희귀질환자에 대한 의료소모품 택배 직배송 행정에 나선 상태다.주사기, 수액세트, 석션팁, 석션카테터, 멸균 식염수, 소독솜 등 희귀질환자 재가 치료에 필수적인 소모품이다. 복지부는 필요한 경우 의약품 배송도 단계적으로 추진할 계획이다.개정 의료법이 국회를 통과하면서 오는 12워부터 비대면진료가 본격적으로 제도화되는데, 희귀질환자 등에 대한 비대면진료를 폭넓게 허용하고 제한적으로 병원급 이상 의료기관에서도 비대면진료를 수행할 수 있게 하는 게 주요 내용이다.복지부는 비대면진료법 시행 전까지 지필공의료를 토대로 비대면서비스를 확대한다는 기조다.복지부 관계자는 "지역·필수·공공의료 공백 문제 해소가 복지부 주요 정책 방향인 만큼 지필공실 신설과 함께 AI·비대면진료를 활용한 지필공의료 강화 방안이 더 마련될 것"이라고 설명했다.의료계 관계자도 "지필공의료 강화에 이어 중동전쟁이 장기화하면서 복지부가 비대면진료, AI 신기술을 통한 보건의료 규제를 지금보다 완화하려는 움직을 반복적으로 보이고 있다"면서 "규제 특례란 이유로 보건의료 카운터파트와 충분한 협의를 거치지 않는 경우도 일부 감지돼 예의주시하는 상황"이라고 말했다.
<
291
292
293
294