#

Dailypharm Live Search Close
  • Local companies in panic over ‘Eliquis’ patent suit result
  • by Kim, Jin-Gu | translator Alice Kang | 2021-04-09 05:56:00
Supreme court reversed and remanded the first and second trial and ruled in favor of BMS
Discontinued sale of generics and full-fledged lawsuit for damages deemed inevitable
Price cut of Eliquis will also be pushed back…current price ceiling may be maintained

The winner and loser of the long patent suit were reversed in the end.

 

After losing the first and second trial, BMS finally got the upper hand in the fight with the generic manufacturers with a favorable ruling by the supreme court.

 

On the other side, the generic companies are in hot water due to the unexpected result.

 

In addition to immediately discontinuing the sale of its generics, the companies are expecting a massive damages claim will be filed by the original drug’s company.

 

The ruling will also affect the price cut that was previously ordered for Eliquis.

 

If the ruling is finalized, the price cut disposition will be pushed back to the patent expiry date.

 

◆Case remanded to Patent Court… Attention on whether the final ruling sides with the Supreme Court's decision On the 8th, the Supreme Court’s Special 3rd Division reversed and remanded the original ruling of the patent invalidation suit in the appeal filed by BMS against Navipharm, Huons, Intron Biotechnology, and Alvogen Korea.

 

The lawsuit is linked to multiple other suits filed by BMS including the patent infringement suit as well as the administrative suit filed in objection to the disposition to reduce the ceiling price of Eliquis.

 

Considering the gravity of the issue, the Supreme Court rendered an en banc decision.

 

The Supreme Court’s ruling is not final.

 

As the Supreme Court reversed the original judgment, the case will once again be tried by the Patent Court.

 

However, as most trials for remanded cases follow the higher court’s decision, which would be the Supreme Court’s decision in this case, expectations are leaning towards BMS’s victory.

 

◆Patent infringement suit to pace up… generic sales highly likely to be discontinued

With the victory, BMS expects to be able to achieve three goals.

 

First is the discontinued sale of generics.

 

The prescription of Eliquis has been dwindling with the release of its generics.

 

According to U-BIST, outpatient prescription sales of Eliquis had increased annually from 19.5 billion won in 2016 to 49 billion won in 2019.

 

However, its sales dropped 3% to 47.7 billion won last year.

 

On the other hand, prescription sales of generics of Eliquis have been rapidly increasing, from 1.2 billion won accrued from July to December in 2019 to the 8.3 billion won last year.

 

The numbers suggest that the release of generics had some effect in reducing Eliquis prescriptions.

 

BMS also plans to speed up the patent infringement suits filed against each generic company.

 

Around 10 relevant suits are currently in progress.

 

The cases were waiting for the Supreme Court's judgment on this case to determine whether the generic drugs infringed upon BMS Korea's patent right.

 

If BMs wins the patent infringement suit, BMS will also be able to enjoy reflective benefits from the discontinuation of its generics.

 

◆ Full-fledged claim for damages deemed inevitable.…calculation of the compensation amount is key BMS's second purpose is to file claims for damages against the generic companies.

 

The Supreme Court's ruling recognized the validity of the drug substance patent.

 

If the court recognizes the patent infringement of the generic companies in subsequent infringement lawsuits, BMS will meet all the requirements to claim compensation for damages.

 

Eliquis generics that were released since June 2019 include ▲Chong Kun Dang’s ‘Liquisia’ ▲Samjin Pharm’s ‘Elxaban’ ▲Yuhan Corp’s ‘Yuhan Apixaban’ ▲Hanmi Pharm’s ‘Apixban’ ▲Aju Pharm’s ‘Eliban’, and ▲Yooyoung Pharm’s ‘Yupix.’ Last year, prescription sales of Liquisia were 2.6 billion won, and 1.1 billion won for Yuhan Apixaban.

 

The key lies in the reinforced standards used for the calculation of compensation for damages since last December.

 

Last year, the National Assembly passed an amendment to the Patent Act that would strengthen the standards used to calculate damages caused by patent infringement.

 

Previously, the compensation was calculated by multiplying the 'range of production capacity' by the 'profit per unit.' However, the newly amended act that took effect in December last year adds an amount calculated by multiplying the 'amount exceeding range of the production capacity' by the 'reasonable royalty.' For instance, under the previous law, if the patent holder's production capacity was 100 but the infringer sold 1000, the patent holder was unable to receive compensation for the 900 that exceeds the patent holder's production capacity.

 

However, the amended act allows for the company to receive compensation for the exceeding 900 products as well.

 

At first sight, the prescription amount of the original Eliquis overwhelms the amount of generics prescribed.

 

However, experts believe the result may differ depending on how 'production capacity' is interpreted.

 

Nevertheless, faced with potential claims for damages by BMS, generic companies are now moving to voluntarily discontinue sales of their generic products.

 

An unnamed official of one company that sells a generic of Eliquis stated, "After the ruling, we are considering whether we should voluntarily stop selling our product." ◆Price cut disposition for Eliquis may be suspended until September 2024 The third is to nullify the drug price cut disposition.

 

In July 2019, the government had notified BMS that it would lower the price ceiling of Eliquis by 30% with the reason being the release of its generics.

 

However, BMS had filed a suit with the Administrative Court to suspend the price cut as the final ruling has not been made on its substance patent suit.

 

BMS's request was to suspend the execution of the price cut disposition until the Supreme Court's ruling.

 

The court accepted the company's request, therefore Eliquis is currently being sold at the same price, at 1,185 won per tablet.

 

With the Supreme Court's ruling adding support, the government's justification to execute price cuts based on the introduction of generics will not be able to stand.

 

The substance patent of Eliquis will expire on September 9th, 2024.

 

If the Patent Court ruling is in line with the Supreme Court ruling, the launch of Elquis's generics will be postponed to September 2024.

 

Also, in that case, it is highly likely that the price of Eliquis will be lowered in October 2024.

 

  • 0
Reader Comment
0
Member comment Write Operate Rule
Colse

댓글 운영방식은

댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.

댓글 노출방식은

댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.

댓글의 삭제 기준은

다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.

  • 저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우

    상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물

    타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물

  • 근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물

    특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우

    특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용

    사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우

    욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용

    정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)

    특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우

    특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우

    특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우

    타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우

  • 게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용

    서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우

    동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우

    부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함

    제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우

    돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물

    게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우

  • 수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우

  • 기타사항

    각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우

    기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우

    기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용

  • 사실 관계 확인 후 삭제

    저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우

    타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우

    당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)

  • ※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.

    ※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.

    ※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.

If you want to see the full article, please JOIN US (click)