
The treatment landscape is undergoing significant changes as new drugs for atopic dermatitis, including biologics and JAK inhibitors, have emerged over the past few years.
Experts assess that patients who gave up on receiving treatments due to recurrence and side effects are revisiting hospitals with the introduction of new drugs.
As treatment options become diverse, the primary concern for the clinical field is 'what' treatment to use.
During the meeting with DailyPharm, Professor Seong Jun Seo of Soon Chun Hyang University Cheonan Hospital's Department of Dermatology emphasized the importance of personalized treatment tailored to each patient, along with consideration of economic factors.
More treatment options to treating atopic dermatitis…"personalized treatment is key" Atopic dermatitis treatment options have expanded beyond the previous standard therapies, which include moisturizers and topical steroids, to two types: biologics and oral JAK inhibitors.
Currently, three biologics and a JAK inhibitor are listed for reimbursement in Korea.

Professor Seo said, "In my opinion, criteria for selecting a treatment should be based on the patient's condition and needs, and that 'the best drug should be the first one used'," and stressed, "It is crucial to provide the best treatment option for each patient from the very beginning." For example, for patients with atopic dermatitis who also have other allergic conditions (such as asthma or rhinitis), or those who are elderly or have chronic diseases, a biologic with a lower burden on the systemic immune system is considered first.
In contrast, for patients who desire a quick effect or have a strong fear of injections, an oral JAK inhibitor is used first.
This means that a personalized treatment, which considers both treatment goals and patient preferences, is key to treatment success.
However, in reality, insurance criteria are a stumbling block.
Under the current National Health Insurance's Special Case Medical Expense Coverage criteria, new drug treatment is limited to severe patients (EASI score ≥23, BSA ≥10%).
This leaves moderate patients in a reimbursement blind spot, and experts unanimously agree that this needs to be improved to widely support personalized treatment.
Professor Seo also pointed out that "more flexible criteria are needed, such as giving weighted scores to lesions on areas that significantly affect quality of life, like the face and neck, even if the EASI score is below 23." One Year After Adtralza's Launch…Patients are more satisfied with improved safety and facial flusing In this situation, the evaluation from the field is that Adtralza (tralokinumab) from LEO Pharma, which was the second biologic to be listed in Korea, is gaining favor with many patients since its launch last year.
Adtralza, which has an IL-13 single-target mechanism that selectively targets only interleukin-13, was noted as a strong competitor to the existing Dupixent (which has an IL-4/13 dual-target mechanism).
In clinical trials, Adtralza achieved an EASI-75 score in 56% of patients at week 16, demonstrating its superior efficacy compared to placebo.
It also showed a 38.9% achievement rate for an IGA score of 0/1 (almost clear of lesions).
Adtralza was listed for health insurance reimbursement in May 2024.
In its first year, it has successfully established itself in the prescription lists of university hospitals, rapidly expanding its market share.
What are Adtralza's unique strengths, then?
Professor Seo, who has prescribed various treatments in the clinical setting, highlighted Adtralza's excellent safety profile.
Professor Seo explained, "Dupixent generally has high satisfaction due to its excellent efficacy and low side effects, but its drawbacks include unexpected side effects like conjunctivitis and facial flushing," and added, "While Adtralza can also cause conjunctivitis, the incidence is lower than with Dupixent, and it shows an effect in improving symptoms in patients who experienced facial flushing with Dupixent." As improvement of symptoms in exposed areas is directly related to a patient's quality of life, Adtralza could be a favorable option to reduce the disease burden for atopic dermatitis patients who experience social avoidance due to severe inflammation on their face or neck.
Patient A, who was present with Professor Seo, said, "After being treated with Adtralza, my symptoms improved noticeably over time.
I took it for about half a year after the initial dose and felt a clear treatment effect." Another strength is its cost-effectiveness.
Regarding this, Professor Seo said, "Adtralza's drug price is lower than that of other biologics.
It's about 60% of Dupixent's cost, which makes it a preferred option for patients with a significant financial burden." Given the long-term nature of atopic dermatitis treatment, the cost of medication is a concern for both patients and medical professionals.
In terms of cost-utility, Adtralza's superior accessibility is notable.
Limitations of inter-class switching…highlighted biomarker importance With the increasing number of new treatment options, the project of creating an environment that benefits patients is gaining prominence.
This year, in response to requests from the field, the government partially relaxed reimbursement criteria to allow inter-class switching between biologics and JAK inhibitors.
However, the lack of a provision for changing within the same class remains a point of regret.
Professor Seo said, "Atopic dermatitis is a complex disease with various contributing factors, so a more flexible insurance application is needed for treatment selection," and added, "The symptom patterns and patient responses can vary, so when one drug is insufficient, a path should be opened to allow switching to a different drug within the same class." Lastly, Professor Seo emphasized the importance of biomarker development for the future of atopic dermatitis treatment.
He explained that although symptoms can now be suppressed for long periods with available therapies, personalized indicators are necessary to establish precision medicine.
Professor Seo added, "Atopic dermatitis is a difficult disease that requires long-term management, but with recent treatment innovations, it is becoming a manageable chronic disease." He concluded, "To implement precision medicine, we need personalized indicators for each patient, and when predictive treatment technologies are introduced in the future, we can take another step closer to curing atopic dermatitis."
댓글 운영방식은
댓글은 실명게재와 익명게재 방식이 있으며, 실명은 이름과 아이디가 노출됩니다. 익명은 필명으로 등록 가능하며, 대댓글은 익명으로 등록 가능합니다.
댓글 노출방식은
댓글 명예자문위원(팜-코니언-필기모양 아이콘)으로 위촉된 데일리팜 회원의 댓글은 ‘게시판형 보기’와 ’펼쳐보기형’ 리스트에서 항상 최상단에 노출됩니다. 새로운 댓글을 올리는 일반회원은 ‘게시판형’과 ‘펼쳐보기형’ 모두 팜코니언 회원이 쓴 댓글의 하단에 실시간 노출됩니다.
댓글의 삭제 기준은
다음의 경우 사전 통보없이 삭제하고 아이디 이용정지 또는 영구 가입제한이 될 수도 있습니다.
저작권·인격권 등 타인의 권리를 침해하는 경우
상용 프로그램의 등록과 게재, 배포를 안내하는 게시물
타인 또는 제3자의 저작권 및 기타 권리를 침해한 내용을 담은 게시물
근거 없는 비방·명예를 훼손하는 게시물
특정 이용자 및 개인에 대한 인신 공격적인 내용의 글 및 직접적인 욕설이 사용된 경우
특정 지역 및 종교간의 감정대립을 조장하는 내용
사실 확인이 안된 소문을 유포 시키는 경우
욕설과 비어, 속어를 담은 내용
정당법 및 공직선거법, 관계 법령에 저촉되는 경우(선관위 요청 시 즉시 삭제)
특정 지역이나 단체를 비하하는 경우
특정인의 명예를 훼손하여 해당인이 삭제를 요청하는 경우
특정인의 개인정보(주민등록번호, 전화, 상세주소 등)를 무단으로 게시하는 경우
타인의 ID 혹은 닉네임을 도용하는 경우
게시판 특성상 제한되는 내용
서비스 주제와 맞지 않는 내용의 글을 게재한 경우
동일 내용의 연속 게재 및 여러 기사에 중복 게재한 경우
부분적으로 변경하여 반복 게재하는 경우도 포함
제목과 관련 없는 내용의 게시물, 제목과 본문이 무관한 경우
돈벌기 및 직·간접 상업적 목적의 내용이 포함된 게시물
게시물 읽기 유도 등을 위해 내용과 무관한 제목을 사용한 경우
수사기관 등의 공식적인 요청이 있는 경우
기타사항
각 서비스의 필요성에 따라 미리 공지한 경우
기타 법률에 저촉되는 정보 게재를 목적으로 할 경우
기타 원만한 운영을 위해 운영자가 필요하다고 판단되는 내용
사실 관계 확인 후 삭제
저작권자로부터 허락받지 않은 내용을 무단 게재, 복제, 배포하는 경우
타인의 초상권을 침해하거나 개인정보를 유출하는 경우
당사에 제공한 이용자의 정보가 허위인 경우 (타인의 ID, 비밀번호 도용 등)
※이상의 내용중 일부 사항에 적용될 경우 이용약관 및 관련 법률에 의해 제재를 받으실 수도 있으며, 민·형사상 처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.
※위에 명시되지 않은 내용이더라도 불법적인 내용으로 판단되거나 데일리팜 서비스에 바람직하지 않다고 판단되는 경우는 선 조치 이후 본 관리 기준을 수정 공시하겠습니다.
※기타 문의 사항은 데일리팜 운영자에게 연락주십시오. 메일 주소는 dailypharm@dailypharm.com입니다.